DEFIANCE....................2
believe that magnitude lies in defiance, and that attack is grandeur T 12 C 5 (316)
him. It represents the ultimate defiance in a direct form which M 6 B 2 M(18)
 
 DEFICIENT...................1
centuries. Psychologists are generally quite deficient in this respect, as areT 4 C 16 (80)
 
 DEFIED......................1
I wandered from Your Will, defied It, broke Its laws, and W 329 L 1 (581)
 
 DEFILED.....................5
that the altar has been defiled, and needs to be repaired T 2 B 32 (29)
endure to see his own defiled altar. But since the altar T 2 C 17 (35)
since the altar HAS been defiled, his state becomes doubly dangerous T 2 C 17 (35)
Godlike mind can never BE defiled. The ego never was and T 6 D 2 (138)
D 12 You have defiled the altar but NOT the T 11 D 12 (289)
 
 DEFILEMENT..................1
permitted to look upon the defilement of the altar, it also T 2 C 16 (35)
 
 DEFINE......................13
not reciprocal. The whole DOES define the part, but the part T 8 H 2 (208)
but the part does NOT define the whole. This is as T 8 H 2 (208)
but signifies that you would define what salvation IS, and what T 13 H 13 (357)
past that you learned to define your own needs, and acquired T 15 F 2 (400)
Will. It is impossible to define it otherwise and UNDERSTAND it T 16 G 1 (444)
B 5 Thus they DEFINE their life and where they T 21 B 5 (575)
see them as different, and define the difference as joy. Yet T 22 C 2 (610)
is a principle which would define what the Creator of reality T 23 C 6 (633)
see him, so do you define the function he will have T 25 F 5 (682)
Him. I have tried to define what seeing is, and I W 59 RI 4 (108)
false it is necessary to define God as something He is W 66 L 6 (122)
form? Who asks you to define the ego and explain how U 3 A 2 U(4)
have a form. Who can define the undefinable? And yet there U 3 A 3 U(4)
 
 DEFINED.....................13
interpersonal relationship is limited or defined by what you want it T 1 C 1 (18)
3 To project, as defined above, is a fundamental attribute T 2 A 3 (20)
wrong about themselves. They have DEFINED themselves as they were not T 14 D 3 (370)
meaning except as its Creator defined it by His Will. It T 16 G 1 (444)
what will bring rejoicing is defined another way, and sought for T 25 E 1 (679)
Yet how could justice be defined without insanity where love means T 25 I 3 (691)
For nothing here but is defined as what you see it T 29 G 5 (798)
question what we have already defined. And the purpose of these W 28 L 4 (47)
created them like Himself and defined them as part of Him W 68 L 3 (126)
ego damns. Neither need be defined except by this. Yet could U 3 A 10 U(5)
B 3 Resistance as defined here can be characteristic of P 3 B 3 P(4)
of any kind may be defined as the result of a P 3 E 6 P(10)
of psychotherapy, then, can be defined simply as forgiveness, for no P 3 G 1 P(14)
 
 DEFINES.....................4
bring him joy, as he defines it. It is not the T 25 E 1 (679)
a world immutable, as each defines the changeless and eternal truth T 25 H 6 (687)
accord with God as He defines Himself is appropriate for use W 67 L 2 (124)
Him complete Himself as He defines completion. You will understand that W 105 L 5 (211)
 
 DEFINING....................4
a matter of definition. By DEFINING the mind wrongly, you perceive T 9 J 3 (246)
is for. You are not defining it in past terms. You W 28 L 3 (47)
not become hopelessly involved in defining happiness and determining the meansW 66 L 3 (121)
we do not insist on defining the problem. Perhaps we will W 79 L 8 (158)
 
 DEFINITE....................7
time. Nevertheless, it has a definite contribution to make to your T 6 B 2 (129)
recommended that you set a definite time interval for using the W 27 L 3 (46)
be making a series of definite commitments. The question of whether W 28 L 1 (47)
often as necessary. There is definite gain in refusing to allow W 74 L 6 (145)
somewhere all unknown. Nothing so definite that you could say with W 183 L 1 (394)
be helpful to take any definite stand on reincarnation. A teacher M 25 A 3 M(58)
who do not. If a definite stand on it were required M 25 A 3 M(58)
 
 DEFINITION..................32
A need implies lack by definition. It involves the recognition that T 1 B 51e (15)
are distortions of perception, by definition. They are a means of T 1 C 6 (19)
mind is not free, by definition. It is possessed, or held T 2 B 4 (24)
out of his control by definition. Yet any attempt to resolve T 2 E 13 (42)
irreconcilable. They were conflict-prone by definition because they wanted different thingsT 3 F 2 (57)
confused; it is uncertain by definition.

--- Manuscript
T 3 F 4 (57)
Wishes are not facts by definition. To wish is
T 3 H 11 (65)
NOT a variable state, by definition. T 7 D 6 T 7 D 5 (160)
healer more carefully now. By definition, he is trying to GIVE T 9 D 1 (228)
is merely a matter of definition. By DEFINING the mind wrongly T 9 J 3 (246)
of chaos are meaningless by definition. Creation is perfectly lawful, and T 9 J 4 (246)
seen. Clarity undoes confusion by definition, and to look upon darkness T 10 F 3 (265)
is poor reality testing by definition. There is nothing to prevent T 11 B 2 (281)
the HOLY SPIRIT sees. The definition of reality is Gods T 11 I 3 (304)
is directly attributable to its definition of guilt. To the ego T 12 B 2 (312)
you as Heaven. For your definition of Heaven IS Hell and T 12 D 2 (319)
function, which is temporary by definition. HIS emphasis is therefore on T 12 D 8 (321)
love. Fear involves substitution by definition, for it is loves T 18 A 3 (480)
evil. And it is this definition of Him which you are W 66 L 6 (122)
trying today to undo your definition of God and replace it W 67 L 2 (124)
you are part of His definition of Himself. 3. W 67 L 2 (124)
unchangeable with transitory states by definition false. And that includes allW 152 L 5 (322)
be valueless to him by definition. What would he want it M 5 H 2 M(15)
Word of God and His definition of His Son. It is M 5 J 2 M(16)
could it be otherwise? By definition, an illusion is an attempt M 9 A 2 M(25)
becomes a miracle worker by definition. His sins have been forgiven M 19 A 4 M(48)
the difference is temporary by definition. In some cases, it may M 30 A 1 M(68)
it real, and seeks by definition to ensure that its illusive U 3 A 2 U(4)
3 There is no definition for a lie that serves U 3 A 3 U(4)
We cannot really make a definition for what the ego is U 3 A 4 U(4)
by this. Yet could a definition be more sure, or more U 3 A 10 U(5)
G. The Definition of Healing P 3 P 3 G 0 P(14)
 
 DEFINITIONS.................6
or separation. There are some definitions which I asked you to T 2 A 1 (20)
they are not the first definitions which are given. Nevertheless, the T 2 A 1 (20)
toward ATTACK. The egos definitions of EVERYTHING are childish, and T 8 H 1 (208)
2 The reason why definitions in terms of function are T 8 H 2 (208)
is so for you. His definitions ARE His laws, for by T 9 J 6 (247)
and heavy armaments, its legal definitions and its codes, its ethics W 135 L 3 (285)
 
 DEFINITIVE..................1
this is the simplest, most definitive, the prototype of all the W 138 L 6 (301)
 
 DEFLATION...................1
threatened. This produces either ego deflation or ego inflation, resulting inT 4 C 8 (78)
 
 DEFORMED....................1
could its shadow be except deformed? P 3 E 3 P 3 E 2 P(9)
 
 DEFORMITY...................2
and ugly since it mimics deformity. If a deformity is seen P 3 E 2 P(9)
it mimics deformity. If a deformity is seen as real, what P 3 E 2 P(9)
 
 DEFY........................1
do nothing. We need not defy his power. He has none W 170 L 7 (378)
 
 DEGREE......................10
quite apart from either the degree or the direction of the T 1 B 52a (16)
is NOT a matter of degree. Only while there are different T 2 B 23 (27)
which he proceeds from one degree to the next. He corrects T 2 B 23 (27)
course are NOT matters of degree. Certain fundamental concepts CANNOT be T 3 D 1 (52)
are dealing with ABILITIES, where degree of development is meaningful. ThisT 7 D 3 (159)
mild irritation to rage. The degree of the emotion you experience W 21 L 2 (36)
they are helpful that any degree of reality should be accorded M 5 B 4 M(10)
deserves the name. Yet each degree, however small, is worth achieving M 5 J 1 M(16)
never be a matter of degree. Either truth is apparent or M 18 A 4 M(45)
varies in intensity; that the degree of threat differs according to P 3 E 8 P(11)